G.S For PM

I'm aggravated. About something I've already explained, on here. 

To give you context, I joined a group about Canadian politics. 

The hot topic has been about Alberta wanting to separate from Canada.

I said that I could see Alberta having a referendum like Quebec had in 1995.
I also said that Alberta got treated pretty badly in the HOC.
And that has been ongoing. 

Someone asked for an example. 

I sent them a clip from when the MP for Alberta
was asking why Alberta's being treated
"Like the fart in the room."

And instead of answering that, 
THEY MADE A THING ABOUT THE WORD FART, 
BECAUSE THAT WAS MORE IMPORTANT, 
THAN WHAT THE MP FROM ALBERTA BROUGHT UP.

BEING TREATED LIKE THAT HAS BEEN ONGOING. 

THAT'S WHY I BROUGHT IT UP. 

IF QUEBEC WAS BEING TREATED LIKE THAT, 
THEY'D SAY SOMETHING ABOUT IT, TOO, 
BUT THEY AREN'T!

BECAUSE HOW DARE ANYONE TREAT THEM LIKE THAT!
GET IT!?

That's why I said that. 

Because any other province, getting treated like that
WOULD NOT LIKE IT, EITHER. 
WOULD NOT APPRECIATE IT. 

So the guy who didn't like the possibility
that Alberta could have a referendum like Quebec did, 

was all like Alberta only pays 14% of the GDP of Canada... 

Fine. Okay. Sure, it does. I never disputed it. 
I never argued about it, as a fact. 

BUT WHAT HE DID WAS... 
INSTEAD OF ASKING ME IF I KNEW THAT, 
HE CALLED ME IGNORANT
BECAUSE HE ASSUMED THAT I DIDN'T. 

WHETHER I DID OR DIDN'T KNOW THAT, 
WASN'T WHAT I BROUGHT UP... 

I BROUGHT UP:

1) I'M NOT DOING THAT TO ANYONE ELSE
2) I DON'T SEE THAT BEING DONE TO ANYONE ELSE
3) IT'D BE COOL TO STATE FACTS WITHOUT DOING IT
4) DOING IT IS UNECESSARY
5) ASSUMING ANYTHING ANYONE DOES OR DOESN'T KNOW
WOULD BE IGNORANT OF ME TO DO. 

I had to f*cking try to explain this to people
WHO WANTED TO GASLIGHT ME ABOUT THE CONTEXT
IN WHICH THE GUY CALLED ME IGNORANT
AND THEY WANTED TO ARGUE WITH ME
ABOUT THE MEANING OF THE WORD IGNORANT
LIKE THAT SHOULDN'T BE INSULTING TO ME. 

So I asked:

Would it have been BETTER or WORSE
if he had outright called me STUPID instead of IGNORANT?

What was the point in him calling me ANYTHING?

ON AN ASSUMPTION.
ABOUT WHAT I DID ALREADY
OR SUPPOSEDLY WAS TOO "IGNORANT" TO KNOW?

But my point was... 

THAT IT WOULD BE IGNORANT OF ME TO DO THAT.
WHICH IS WHY I DON'T DO THAT. 
WHICH IS WHY I'M NOT AS "IGNORANT" AS "ASSUMED."

I'm only bringing this up to make a point about assumptions. 
I have assumptions made about me all the time. 

But to assume things, that aren't even true, is kind of ignorant. 
And calling someone ignorant based on assumptions, that aren't true
is kind of ignorant. 

YET AM I THE ONE CALLING PEOPLE IGNORANT FOR DOING IT?

I'M SAYING THAT THE ACT OF DOING IT IS IGNORANT. 
I NEVER MADE IT ABOUT ANYONE BEING IGNORANT. 
AND THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE. 

But my point also is why should I have to point out that it's ignorant to do it?
AND THAT I'M NOT THE ONE FKN DOING IT!!!!
AND WHEN IT IS DONE TO ME AND I SAY I AM NOT COOL WITH IT, 
I'M EITHER:

1) TAKING IT OUT OF CONTEXT,
2) I NEED TO BE "TOLD" WHAT "IGNORANT" EVEN MEANS...
3) I'M TOLD THAT SOMETHING THAT WAS MEANT AS AN INSULT WAS "CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM" 

Or whatever else they want to say to justify fkn doing it!

Because someone called me "ignorant"
so therefore everyone must jump on me
for my "ignorance" ffs. 

DO YOU SEE ME DOING THAT SH*T?
NO? WHY IS THAT?

I DON'T DO THAT SH*T, BECAUSE IT'S FKN IGNORANT
TO FKN DO THAT SH*T. 

AND IT IS IGNORANT TO DO IT AND TRY TO JUSTIFY IT
BY TRYING TO GASLIGHT SOMEONE ABOUT CONTEXT
AND THE DEFINITION OF THE WORD, 
VS HOW IT WAS INTENDED. 

Because not only am I supposed to tolerate that sh*t, 
I'm supposed to take the INSULT as "constructive criticism" ffs. 

READ UP ON THE FACTS YOU ALREADY KNOW!!!! DA FUQ?
YOU NEED TO FKN EDUCATE YOURSELF!!!!!

IF I NEEDED TO EDUCATE MYSELF, 
I WOULDN'T HAVE ALREADY KNOWN THAT!!!! 

I'll tell you something... 
Alberta pays 14%... 
Alberta has around 11% of Canada's population!

So maybe they only want to pay 11%, only for Alberta!

Am I saying I don't care if they want to separate?
Am I saying "Let them separate?"

I could say... If they want to so fkn bad, 
maybe they should get to see what that's like. 

How feasible it would truly be to even try to do it... 

SAME FOR QUEBEC. 
OR ANY PROVINCE. 

Because if any province thinks it can make it, 
on its own, if it can, all the more power to it... 

But if it does break off from the rest of the country, 
and decided it wanted to come back, and be a part of the country, again, 
WOULD WE HAVE TO LET IT?!

IT CAN GO BOTH WAYS. 

If Alberta left Canada, 
and then wanted to come back, 
Canada could say: "Fk you, Alberta!"

Same for Quebec!

The rest of Canada could say "Fk you, Quebec!"
If Quebec were to separate, then wanted to come back.

Or if Ontario did it. Or if any other province did it. 

So now, giving you the context... 

Some people think it is okay to do that. 
And not only do they think it is okay to do that, 
IF I DID THAT, IT WOULD BE IGNORANT OF ME. 
BUT TO BE EXPECTED SINCE I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING... 

And I'm tired of telling anyone that I'm not okay with xyz
AND WHY I AM NOT OKAY WITH IT, 

AND EITHER THEY CAN'T OR DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT, 
OR THEY JUST WANT TO FKN ARGUE WITH ME
FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUING OR SOMETHING... 

AND THEY EXPECT ME TO ARGUE WITH THEM!
AND THEY EXPECT ME TO KEEP DEFENDING 
AND EXPLAINING
WHEN I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO FKN EXPLAIN IT, 
BECAUSE IT SHOULD ALREADY MAKE SENSE. 
SO MUCH SENSE
THAT IT WOULDN'T NEED TO BE EXPLAINED
BY ME OR BY ANYONE ELSE, 

NOT ONCE, LET ALONE MORE THAN ONCE. 

It would already be understood. 

What wouldn't there be NOT TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT IT?
WHAT ABOUT IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE?

WHAT ABOUT IT IS THERE TO TRY TO GASLIGHT ME ABOUT?
TO TRY TO ARGUE WITH ME ABOUT?

Since something happens to make sense, 
WHAT WOULD THERE BE TO ARGUE WITH ME ABOUT. 

WHY I DON'T APPRECIATE BEING INSULTED?
WANT TO ARGUE WITH ME ABOUT THAT?

Why insulting someone by assuming something about them
THAT ISN'T TRUE
IS IGNORANT?

AND THEN... BEING CALLED THE IGNORANT ONE?
IF I WAS THE ONE DOING IT, I'D BE IGNORANT!
I AM NOT DOING THAT!

Why would I fkn assume something about someone?
DO I NEED TO DO THAT?

BUT YET PEOPLE WANT TO ASSUME I DON'T KNOW
WHAT IGNORANT MEANS
BECAUSE I'M TOO IGNORANT TO KNOW THAT!!!! FFS!!!!

SEE WHY I KEEP A LOT OF SH*T TO MYSELF?
BECAUSE, IS THERE A POINT?

Everything I say, someone's assuming something about me. 

Whether I write a post on here, comment in there, whatever. 

It'd just be cool for people NOT to assume anything about me, period. 
It'd be cool if they realized that doing it is ignorant. 
AND IF I ASSUMED ANYTHING ABOUT THEM, 
INCLUDING WHAT THEY DO OR DON'T KNOW... 
THAT WOULD BE IGNORANT OF ME TO DO. 

SO THEM DOING IT, IS JUST AS IGNORANT
FOR THEM TO DO
AS IT WOULD BE FOR ME TO DO. 

I should not HAVE TO POINT THAT OUT. 
OR EXPLAIN THAT IN ANY WAY. 

OR HAVE TO DEFEND MYSELF BY HAVING TO EXPLAIN THAT.
YET HERE WE ARE. 

It's to the point that I ask myself WHY I EVEN STILL FKN BOTHER. 
EXPLAINING ANYTHING OR TRYING TO... 

AND IF IT MADE SENSE TO THEM, 
THEY WOULDN'T BE ARGUING SEMANTICS WITH ME. 

Or trying to "make me wrong" constantly. 

I'M "IGNORANT" THEREFORE I MUST BE WRONG, 
BECAUSE THEY ASSUME I DON'T KNOW SOMETHING... 

SEE WHERE I'M GOING WITH THAT?

And if I "happen to" know the whole fkn time
THE VERY THING I'M SUPPOSEDLY IGNORANT ABOUT, 
AM I ACTUALLY IGNORANT?
OR WAS I ASSUMED TO BE "IGNORANT?"

AND EVERYONE WHO WANTED TO CALL ME IGNORANT, 
LIKE IT WAS OKAY TO DO THAT, 
IN ANY "CERTAIN" CONTEXT... 

WHEN THEY WERE ACTUALLY WRONG, 
BECAUSE THEY ASSUMED IT, THEY DIDN'T ACTUALLY KNOW
IF I KNEW OR NOT, 
BECAUSE? DID ANYONE ASK ME IF I KNEW?
NO! THEY ASSUMED I DIDN'T KNOW!
AND TRIED TO TREAT ME LIKE I FKN DON'T KNOW ANYTHING!

AND THAT ISN'T COOL WITH ME. 

And that is an example of HERD MENTALITY. 
BECAUSE AFTER ONE PERSON DID IT, 
AND I SAID SOMETHING ABOUT IT, 
YESTERDAY, THIS OTHER GUY DID IT, TODAY. 

AFTER I WARNED PEOPLE, I AM NOT TOLERATING THAT SH*T. 

AND I WOULD APPRECIATE SOME UNDERSTANDING, AND RESPECT. 

So I wrote a post about how for a long time I didn't follow politics. 

And in this city, I have to face that exact same sh*t pretty much every day. 
People assuming sh*t about me. 

It's one of the things that bugs me. 
Not just because it's ignorant, but also because
IF I DID THAT SH*T TO FKN ANYONE, THAT WOULD BE
IGNORANT OF ME TO DO. 

So how is it any LESS ignorant if someone does the SAME sh*t to ME?
It isn't any LESS ignorant!

Do I literally have to ask for respect?!

Because of all the fkn actual ignorance I've seen... 
I didn't fkn say anything about it!

Like how a lot of people in the group are on the Carney train. 

There's something about the guy I do not like. 

While a lot of people are on the train of saying how he's going to save Canada etc. 

If he actively destroys it and puts us in a worse position, 
WHICH I AM NOT SAYING HE WILL, 
BUT IF HE DOES... 
WITH AN AGENDA HE HAD THE WHOLE TIME, 
WHOM OF THOSE SAYING HE'S "THE BEST"
ARE EVER GOING TO ADMIT THAT HE WASN'T?

AND HE WOULDN'T BE, IF HE DESTROYS US. 

But how far must someone go in "ignorance"
to be like... Willfully ignorant?

Like complete denial?

After a lot that I've seen, there are reasons that I don't think like that.

And to explain why I don't think like that is kind of pointless. 

BECAUSE WHO WOULD UNDERSTAND IT?
WHO WOULD THEN UNDERSTAND ME, BETTER
FOR UNDERSTANDING THAT ABOUT ME?
WHO WOULD EVEN LISTEN?
WHO WOULD EVEN CARE?
ABOUT WHY IT FKN BUGS ME?

Should it bug me? Why does it?
Because I'd like to reach a point
WHERE THAT SH*T DOESN'T HAPPEN, ANYMORE. 

AND THEN I CAN LOOK BACK
AT WHEN THAT SH*T USED TO HAPPEN TO ME. 

Would be nice, eh?

-------

Like nobody felt the need to "assume" anything. 
And people ASKED THINGS THEY WANTED TO KNOW. 
AND THEN TALKED ABOUT THEM, 
AND LISTENED. 
AND UNDERSTOOD. 

Understood things like:
That's an ignorant thing to do!

SINCE BEING IGNORANT IS THE INSULT
INTENDED FOR ME... 
DOING THAT, ASSUMING ABOUT ME... 
THAT BEING IGNORANT, WHY DO IT?
WHY NOT AVOID BEING IGNORANT
BY NOT DOING THAT?

KIND OF LIKE HOW I WASN'T DOING IT
BECAUSE THAT'S SOMETHING I WAS ALREADY TAUGHT
NOT TO DO, 
BECAUSE IT'S FKN IGNORANT TO DO!

And that's not even about having MANNERS!!!!
Sort of, but not even about that!!!

IT'S ABOUT UNDERSTANDING WHY DOING IT
IS IGNORANT. 

Because when someone understands why it is ignorant to do, 
MAYBE THEY REALIZE WHY THEY SHOULDN'T!
SINCE BEING "IGNORANT" IS SUCH A BIG THING
THAT IT'S A BIG THING WHEN SOMEONE WANTS TO ASSUME THAT I AM. 

ABOUT SOMETHING I ALREADY KNEW!

So why should I need to educate myself about something I already knew?
Just because someone assumed I didn't know that?

THEY SEE SOMEONE JUMPING ON ME WITH AN ASSUMPTION,
AND THEY DID IT, TOO!

DOES THAT MAKE THEM LESS IGNORANT? NO!
JUST AS IGNORANT!
AS THE FIRST PERSON WHO DID IT. 
AS THE PERSON THEY SAW DOING IT,
AND THEN TRIED TO GASLIGHT ME ABOUT THE CONTEXT. 

That sh*t bugs me. 

SHOULD I GO AROUND DOING IT?
OR WOULD THAT BE IGNORANT OF ME?

Do you get my point, though?

What also bugs me about even having to make a point, 
IS THAT I HAVE TO FIND MANY WAYS
OF MAKING THE SAME POINT. 

BECAUSE IF I TRY TO MAKE A POINT IN ONE WAY, 
AND THEY DON'T GET THE POINT
IF I MAKE IT THAT WAY... 

TRYING ANOTHER WAY TO MAKE THE SAME POINT, 
MIGHT CLICK. 

Here's an example of that... 

There was a guy I dated a long time ago. 
We were watching a show. 

In the show, the kid was crying.. 
And he couldn't seem to understand why the kid was crying. 

So trying to explain it one way, he didn't get it. 
Explained to him another way, he got it. 

But what bugged me was when I was trying to explain other things to him... 
HE'D THINK I WAS LYING, 
BECAUSE "MY STORY CHANGED."

When the only thing that changed was how I told him
THE SAME FACTS THAT WERE ALL TRUE, 
THE SAME FACTS I KEPT TELLING HIM, 
BUT IF I TOLD HIM IN ANOTHER WAY, 
MAYBE IT WOULD BE EASIER TO FKN UNDERSTAND. 

THE FACTS NEVER CHANGED. 
THE WAY I TRIED TO EXPLAIN IT TO HIM, DID, 
BECAUSE IF HE UNDERSTOOD ME, THE FIRST TIME, 
I WOULDN'T HAVE TO FKN REPEAT MYSELF. 

WHICH I ALSO FKN HATE. 

And communication is important
BUT COMPREHENSION IS KEY. 

Because you can tell people things, 
BUT IF THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU, 
AND IF THEY AREN'T EVEN TRYING TO UNDERSTAND YOU, 
AND THEY THINK THAT ASSUMING THINGS ABOUT YOU
IS ALL THEY NEED TO DO, 
ARE THEY GOING TO UNDERSTAND?
Will they?

So then talking to someone who doesn't understand you, at all, 
DOES WHAT?

Are you able to accomplish anything together? 
like you could have, if THEY DID UNDERSTAND?

Are you able to make any PROGRESS?

No? Not likely?

Not much? If any?

I'd rather fkn go it ALONE
THAN FKN GO BACKWARDS WITH ANYONE
OR BECAUSE OF ANYONE. 

If we're not making any progress, 
IS THERE A POINT IN GOING FORWARD?
OR TRYING TO GO FORWARD?
FOR THE SAKE OF TRYING?
FOR THE SAKE OF WANTING TO TRY?
WHY?
FOR WHAT?

That's where I've been at... 
WANTING TO MOVE FORWARD... 
WANTING TO MAKE PROGRESS. 
WANTING UNDERSTANDING. 
WANTING BARE MIN RESPECT. 

But from my experiences, 
HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO TRUST ANYONE?
NOT TO XYZ?

And the more I say anything about why I'm not cool with xyz, 
the more I seem to lose "friends."

And what bugs me is whatever help or whatever I was
supposed to do for someone, 
I can't do those things, for them. 

So whatever they were supposed to receive from me, 
they don't get that. 

Because when there is something I'm supposed to do for someone, 
I might not know what it is, 
BUT I CAN FEEL IT, IN MY SOUL. 

THAT'S WHY I HANG IN FOR AS LONG AS I DO.
OFTEN AT MY OWN EXPENSE. 

Someone I used to talk to regularly, who I thought was a friend,
randomly blocked me, today. 

SAID NOTHING TO ME ABOUT WHY OR WHATEVER, 
JUST DID IT, 
AS THOUGH I MEANT NOTHING TO HIM. 

AND I SHOULD BE USED TO THAT,  BY NOW. 

MAYBE I POSTED SOMETHING HE DIDN'T LIKE. 
I DON'T KNOW. 

MAYBE HE ASSUMED SOMETHING, TOO. 
INSTEAD OF JUST ASKING ME. 

But, yes, I am disappointed.
Didn't think he would do that, but whatever. 
At least I didn't do that to him. 

I often feel like I don't have any actual friends. 
I know a bunch of people. 
I'm acquainted with some people... 

BUT WHO DO I KNOW... WHO ACTUALLY KNOWS ME?

Maybe some people THINK they know me, 
but do they?

DO THEY REALLY KNOW ME?

But what I won't do is try to defend myself to anyone. 
IF THEY WANT TO WALK AWAY FROM ME, 
WHATEVER THE REASON, 
THEY CAN DO IT!

WHETHER OR NOT I THOUGHT THEY WERE MY FRIEND. 
WHETHER OR NOT I WISH THEY ACTUALLY WERE. 
WHETHER OR NOT A LOT OF THINGS. 

But why should I put whatever I've got into anyone
WHO'S JUST GOING TO BOUNCE?
WITHOUT EVEN SAYING A WORD.

Do they have to say anything to bounce? No. 
THEY ARE ALLOWED TO BOUNCE, 
IF THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT. 

Should I be surprised if they do?
Their choice!

Sometimes I feel like just fkn deleting the whole damn thing, again. 
I did it once. I deleted fkn Facebook. For a few years. 
I don't remember why I opened a new account. 

SOMETIMES I REGRET OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT. 

NOT LIKE I'M DOING MUCH OF ANYTHING PRODUCTIVE ON THERE. 

Just another way for people to assume sh*t about me etc. 

I just wish they wouldn't! But that's asking for way too much. 

It's not just that they assume whatever they assumed about me, 
IT'S THAT THEY TRY TO TREAT ME A TYPE OF WAY
WHEN THEY DO THAT. 
And not only that, they try to justify it. 

Like the assumption they made, that may not even be the case, 
WAS ENOUGH JUSTIFICATION ON ITS OWN
TO TREAT ME HOWEVER THEY THINK IS COOL
OR FINE TO TREAT ME. 

"She's ignorant, so it's okay to treat her like she's ignorant."
That type of sh*t. 

She's this, she's that... So it's okay to treat her like this, like that. 

AND IF I NEVER WAS THIS OR THAT?
IS IT STILL OKAY TO TREAT ME LIKE THIS OR THAT?

That's why it bugs me. 

ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY REALIZE
OR IF THEY REALIZE
THAT I NEVER DESERVED THAT SH*T. 

But if they do realize it, it happens when it's too fkn late
TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. 

I wait for a really fkn long time, 
I give people lots of chances to get their head out of their @ss. 

TO GET SH*T RIGHT. 
TO LEVEL UP.
TO TAKE SH*T SERIOUSLY. 

I pretty much wait until I fkn can't anymore. 
Until I realize there isn't anything to wait for. 
Waiting for something, is something. 
Waiting for nothing, is something else. 

-------

Anyway, there's a lot of movies that are coming out this year. 

There's going to be a new Farris Bueler movie. 
A new Edward Scissorhands movie, 
A new Addams Family movie, 

and a few more I saw... 

I think a sequel of Billy Madison is coming, too. 

I never saw the first one. 

There are lots of movies from the last 10 years or more
that I haven't seen. 

A lot of shows, too. 

I don't watch very much mainstream stuff, honestly. 

I don't know why. Just not a priority, I guess. 
If it was, I'd have seen them all lol, but it's not. 

There was a movie buff guy I used to talk with. 
He only seemed to want to talk about movies, 
and I couldn't talk with him about movies, 
because 99.9% of the movies he saw
AND COLLECTED, 
I never saw, and some I never even heard of. 

----------

Back to the topic of politics for a moment... 
Almost ready to call it a night... 

That politics group I'm in... 

They are totally against Pierre. 
I haven't said anything in his defense
BECAUSE I'VE ALREADY SEEN
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN I SAY ANYTHING
IN MY OWN DEFENSE. 

AND THEY ALREADY HAVE THEIR MINDS MADE UP
ABOUT THE GUY. 

They are trying to pick apart his "response" to Carney's speech at Davos. 

Supposedly, they see it as "the greatest speech" 
And it was about Canada standing up to Trump for itself, etc... 
And all this and all that about the speech Carney made... 

And then, they are saying that Pierre is trying to make everything
and anything into his "come back tour."

And that all he does is "make noise and agitate."

THEY SAY ALL THAT SH*T, 
WHEN WHO WAS THE ONE PUSHING FOR JAIL, NOT BAIL?
WAS IT CARNEY? 

There are some things he did that I don't agree with... 
He put soldiers at risk by divulging sensitive info. 

I don't know the whole story behind that, but he did something
along those lines. 

If you know the story about it, feel free to tell me. 

The point is that he shouldn't have done that. 
It's not smart, as a potential leader, to do that. 

Another thing I saw was that the healthcare in Ontario
is only set to increase funds by 2%. 
The costs are like 6%. 
So there are going to be massive cuts, in healthcare. 

They say it's predicted to be as bad as when Harris was making cuts. 
When he was making cuts, 
he made a cut to water testing. 
And then we ended up getting fkn ecoli in Walkerton, Ontario. 

I've been to Walkerton, Ontario. 
It's not a huge place. 

A lot of people got seriously ill from that. 

Somewhere around Walkerton, Ontario, 
there are Mennonites. 

I know this because there were some Mennonites on the bus. 
Which was surprising because I thought they were against
modern tech and transport. 

But maybe there's a difference between Mennonites and Amish people
that I'm missing somewhere. 

So when they jump on Pierre, I don't say anything.
IF I DID, THEY WOULD JUMP ON ME FOR SAYING IT. 

BECAUSE TO THEM, HE'S THIS OR THAT. 
EASY FOR THEM TO ASSUME WHATEVER ABOUT HIM, 
AND ABOUT HIS INTENTIONS... 
ABOUT HIS CAPABILITIES, 
ABOUT ANYTHING ABOUT HIM. 

There is a specific person who would get my vote, 
if he were to run. 

I don't think he will, but if he ever did, I'd totally support him. 

He's a Canadian, who has had a media job, for years... 
He was a host, even. 

Can you guess who he is?
His initials are G.S.

Would be cool to have him as our Prime Minister. 
He's someone respectful, respectable, reasonable... 
Smart... A lot to like and trust about the guy. 

That's who I would pick to be Prime Minister of Canada. 

If you could pick anyone to be the Prime Minister of Canada, 
as long as they are a Canadian... 
From any walk of life... Anyone famous or otherwise... 
Anyone, even non-politicians... 
WHO WOULD YOU PICK TO BE THE PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA?

There's something about Carney I do not like and do not trust. 
I can't say exactly what it is about him, 
but there is something.

There are lots of people who love the guy and trust him
TO SAVE CANADA, FROM ITSELF... 

THEY ARE HAPPY ABOUT HIM. 

If he turns out to be as great as they think he is, cool. 

There is something about him that I just do not trust. 
Not when it comes to Canada. 
Canada's future. 

Should I trust anyone when it comes to Canada's future?

I heard someone say that one of the reasons they want us to
switch to EVs is because then he can put in charging stations everywhere
for the EVs and when people charge their EVs, 
the money for charging them will go to the business owned by the PM. 

HE'S A BANKER.
WHAT DO BANKERS CARE ABOUT?
MONEY!
YOU THINK HE'S GOING TO PASS UP
ANY OPPORTUNITY TO CAPITALIZE, IF HE CAN?
MAYBE HE'LL GIVE HIMSELF A RAISE, 
LIKE TRUDEAU DID. 

Anyway, I'm going to try to sleep. Goodnight.