When I'm done and give up on "getting through" to someone...
THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO REACT.
THEY DO REACT.
OFTEN BADLY.
BECAUSE THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO REACT.
I've had to "deal" with that.
DID I ALWAYS KNOW HOW TO DEAL WITH THAT?
NO.
DID I OFTEN REACT BADLY TO THEIR REACTION?
YEAH.
TWO BAD REACTIONS ARE.... WHAT?
TWO BAD REACTIONS.
THAT'S WHAT THEY ARE.
DID I REACT WELL TO 12 YD?
WHEN HE TRIED TO COME BACK?
NOT ENTIRELY. I TRIED.
BUT HE NEEDED TO REALIZE SOME THINGS.
1) HE DIDN'T KNOW ME THEN
2) HE REALLY DOESN'T KNOW ME NOW
3) I DON'T HAVE TO GIVE HIM ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO WASTE
4) HE ALREADY WASTED THE OPPORTUNITY I ALREADY GAVE HIM
5) I'M NOT "SCARED" TO BE ALONE
6) I PREFER MY SOLITUDE OVER DISHONESTY AND BS
Can't "tell my story" when they don't know what it is!
FOOLISH.
Can exaggerate the things they know....
BUT FILLING IN THE BLANKS....
WITH WHAT I WON'T EXPLAIN YET AGAIN.....
BECAUSE NOBODY WAS LISTENING...
THE MORE THEY TALK, THE MORE BLANKS THERE ARE.
THE TRUTH DOES THE TALKING.
FILLS THE BLANKS HONESTLY.
IN A WAY THEY COULD NEVER.
AND NUMBER 6...... IS A FACT.
DID ANYONE ASK ME WHAT I MEANT?
DID ANYONE ASK ME WHY I SAID IT?
OR DID THAT JUST MEAN "A***'S TOXIC."
THERE IS A BRIDGE BETWEEN WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED
AND WHAT SOMEONE ASSUMED....
OR HOW THEY INTERPRETED.
BECAUSE... IT'S EITHER ABOUT WHAT I SAY....
OR HOW I SAY IT.
If they NEED their INTERPRETATION
TO BE TRUE.....
THEIR ASSUMPTION....
"THEY PICK THE EXPLANATION THAT MAKES
THE MOST SENSE TO THEM."
THEIR OWN EXPLANATION.
NOT MINE.
NEVER ASKED FOR MINE.
AND SOMETIMES I DON'T OFFER ONE....
BECAUSE THEY ALREADY CHOSE THEIRS.
I HAVE TO "DEFEND" MYSELF....
INSIDE SOMEONE ELSE'S "VERSION" OF EVENTS.
"IT'S YOUR TONE." REALLY?
IF I SAY IT THE WAY THEY WOULD....
WOULD THEY "UNDERSTAND" WHAT I'M SAYING?
AND WHY I'M SAYING IT?
THEY WANT MY REACTION
TO SUPPORT THEIR INTERPRETATION.
BUT THEY NEVER ASKED ME!
THEY ASSUMED XYZ, AND THEIR ASSUMPTION
WAS THEIR INTERPRETATION.
LIKE WHEN I LEFT THE "SECURITY" MEETING.
LIKE I HAD A RIGHT TO DO....
BUT.... THAT BECAME AN INTERPRETATION
OF MY ENTIRE PERSONALITY!!!!!!!!!
BECAUSE I WAS "TOO ANGRY" OR WHATEVER....
NO.... BECAUSE.... I HAD A "RIGHT"
TO JUST LEAVE.
SIMPLE.
DID THEY LISTEN TO WHAT I SAID?
OR HOW I SAID IT?
AND THEY WANT ME TO "ARGUE"
WITH THEIR VERSION OF WHAT "HAPPENED."
Someone made a point...
She was saying...
YOU CAN ASSUME WHY PEOPLE MAKE ASSUMPTIONS.
WAS IT FAIR FOR THEM TO TWIST MY WORDS?
"NOTICING SOMETHING
ISN'T THE SAME AS KNOWING WHAT IT MEANS."
I CAN NOTICE THEY ASSUMED SOMETHING ABOUT ME.
IT CAN BUG ME THAT THEY DO THAT SH*T TO ME,
ALL THE TIME!
YOU CAN SEPARATE WHAT YOU KNOW....
FROM WHAT YOU THINK YOU KNOW.
JUST BECAUSE YOU THINK YOU KNOW SOMETHING....
DOESN'T MEAN THAT YOU DO!
THEY THOUGHT THEY KNEW WHAT I MEANT.
THINKING THEY KNEW WHAT I MEANT
ISN'T THE SAME THING AS KNOWING.
THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE POINT WAS!
IT BECOMES: "YOUR TONE."
OR "YOUR FACIAL EXPRESSIONS"
OR SOMETHING ELSE.
"SHE LEFT."
YES, I DID.
WASN'T A POINT IN STAYING.
SHOULD I TAKE RESPONSIBILITY
FOR ANYONE'S INTERPRETATION
OF WHAT I SAID?
EVEN THOUGH THE WORDS I ACTUALLY SAID.....
SHOULD HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENT.
BUT NOBODY LOOKS AT WHAT I SAID.
IF THEY DID..... THEY WOULD LIKELY "UNDERSTAND"
WHY I SAID IT!!!!!!!!!!!!
"I THOUGHT YOUR TONE MEANT XYZ...."
BUT DID IT?
OR DID MY WORDS MEAN WHAT THEY MEANT?
LIKE THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO?
HAVING TO RE-EXPLAIN CERTAIN THINGS....
THAT SHOULDN'T HAVE TO BE RE-EXPLAINED.....
OR CLARIFIED....
IS.... FRUSTRATING.
HAVING TO TRY TO CONVINCE SOMEONE.....
THAT THEY CONVINCED THEMSELVES.....
IS.... FRUSTRATING.
BUT THEY "INTERPRET" YOUR WORDS...
AND "BEHAVIOR."
BECAUSE IF YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO STAY IN THAT MEETING....
AND YOU WALKED OUT ON THE BS....
BECAUSE IT WASN'T GOING ANYWHERE....
AND IF THEY ARE "WRONG"
WILL THEY ADMIT THEY WERE?
IF THEY MADE A "MISTAKE"
WILL THEY ADMIT THEY DID?
I CAN "EXPLAIN" SOMETHING....
OR "CLARIFY"
BUT IF ANYONE IS COMMITTED.....
TO "MISINTERPRETING"
OR"MISUNDERSTANDING" ME....
IS THERE A POINT.... IN TRYING TO "CONVINCE" THEM?
OUT OF THEIR OWN BS?
I CAN GIVE "EXAMPLES" OF WHAT I MEANT.....
IN WAYS THEY MIGHT UNDERSTAND THEM...
BUT... DO MY EXAMPLES
GUARANTEE THAT....
THEY WILL "UNDERSTAND"?
THEY EITHER GET IT OR THEY DON'T!
RIGHT?
BUT.... MY POINT IS....
IF YOU THINK YOU GOT IT....
WHEN YOU ACTUALLY DIDN'T.....
DOES THAT MEAN YOU GOT IT?
BECAUSE YOU THINK YOU DID?
ARE YOU THINKING YOU GOT IT...
OR DID YOU GET IT?
ARE THOSE THE SAME THINGS?
NO?
THAT IS THE POINT.
THINKING YOU GOT SOMETHING...
THAT YOU ACTUALLY DIDN'T....
BECAUSE YOU WERE TOO BUSY THINKING YOU DID...
IS NOT THE SAME THING....
AS ACTUALLY GETTING IT.
So..... THINKING.... That they "get" ME.....
IS NOT THE SAME THING.....
AS UNDERSTANDING ME.
IF THEY CAN'T UNDERSTAND MY WORDS....
AND WHY I SAID WHAT I SAID....
HOW ARE THEY SUPPOSED TO UNDERSTAND ME?
THEY DON'T.
So "expecting" them to understand me....
ISN'T LOGICAL.
WOULDN'T IT BE GROOVY?
JUST TO BE UNDERSTOOD?
BUT? WHEN AM I? EVER? UNDERSTOOD?
WHEN I USE EXAMPLES?
THAT MAKES SENSE?
WHEN I PUT IT IN WRITING?
WHEN THERE'S NO WAY TO TWIST MY WORDS?
INTO SOMETHING I DIDN'T SAY?
ONLY THEN?
If they PUT THEMSELVES IN MY SHOES?
IF THEY EVEN CAN?
BUT WHEN DO THEY EVER DO THAT?
DO THEY EVEN TRY TO?
But??? "A*** has BOUNDARIES?"
"SHE'S TOXIC FOR HAVING BOUNDARIES!"
"FOR NOT WANTING TO PUT UP WITH MY SH*T.... AGAIN."
TRYING TO "RETURN" LIKE THEY DIDN'T FK ME AROUND....
RIGHT?
IF I DID THAT SH*T.... WOULD THEY WANT TO "RECONNECT"?
OR NO????
PROBABLY NOT.
BUT "CAN'T" PUT THEMSELVES IN MY SHOES.
NOT EVEN FOR THAT.
DO I GAF IF THEY "UNDERSTAND" ANYTHING ELSE? NO!
BUT IF THEY UNDERSTOOD THAT... JUST THAT....
THEY'D UNDERSTAND....
WHY I HAVE THOSE "BOUNDARIES."
AND WHY I HAVE TO OPERATE FROM THAT "SPACE."
DO I WANT TO? NO?