I'm back in the writing mode, which is good.
Some of my projects include writing. A lot of them do, actually.
Maybe he was just being a catalyst to help me switch gears.
Indirectly. It wasn't intentional that he did that.
It opened up a couple of conversations about some things, too.
I can consider the things that they say, but, it's still up to me to consider it.
One of the things that came up was foresight.
I was saying that if people had it, they would use it.
My friend said, "Not necessarily."
I said, "Why wouldn't they?"
He said, "It gets to be like a chore to use it so they don't."
It's interesting to have conversations like that.
Because they'll tell you things you might not have thought about.
It's not like I think about certain things a whole lot. Most people don't.
Around 10% of people.... THINK. And of those... 10% of THEM, THINK DEEPLY.
Whatever 10% of 10% is...
90% of people don't really think that much let alone deeply.
And 90% of that 90% don't care enough to think let alone deeply.
What percentage do you figure, of people who have foresight, use it?
I figure around 10%.
A waste of foresight to have it and not use it.
Like "If I treat A*** like XYZ instead of realizing why she'd be upset with xyz..."
"Then it might not go as I'd hoped."
"If I treat A*** like I think she's XYZ... I could be wrong about her and then..."
But that would be using their foresight.
But whatever. I'm "toxic" for not "staying the same" or "being how I used to be"
after being discarded and mishandled constantly.
Was I supposed to "stay the same" and be some sort of push-over?
JUST ACCEPTING AND TOLERATING BS FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE?
ASSUMING: A*** WILL ACCEPT MY APOLOGY AND ACCEPT ME BACK LIKE I DIDN'T DO OR SAY ANYTHING WRONG TO HER.
ASSUMING: I'LL WAIT UNTIL SHE FORGETS AND THEN TRY AGAIN.
I didn't forget like I was supposed to.
And I changed into someone who chose herself over that sh*t.
COULD HAVE AVOIDED THAT WITH FORESIGHT. WHOOPS.
IS IT REALLY MY FAULT THAT THEY COULD HAVE AVOIDED THAT?
BY NOT TREATING ME LIKE THAT?
IT'S NOT.
LIKE IT WOULDN'T BE THEIR FAULT IF I DID XYZ.
BECAUSE I'D BE THE ONE CHOOSING TO DO IT, NOT THEM.
If I chose to be the coward and ghosted them and gave them the silent treatment for 12 years
and tried coming back like nothing had happened....
If I had done that, that would have been my choice.
And if they made me stand on that choice, I'd have to.
And if I got mad that they did, that'd be on me, not them.
For having done xyz and having to stand on it.
FOR HAVING BROKEN THE TRUST THEY CAN'T JUST HAVE BACK.
THE TRUST NOT TO XYZ.
I'D HAVE TO STAND ON THAT IF I DID THAT.
I COULDN'T BE MAD IF I DID THAT BECAUSE I DID THAT.
TO TRY TO PUT IT ON ME 12 YEARS LATER IS FKN WILD THOUGH.
WASN'T EXPECTING THAT, EITHER.
WASN'T EXPECTING ANY OF THE BS I ENCOUNTERED.
At least a couple of years ago... Maybe a few...
I met someone who was decent to me.
We were talking. Him and I. It was nice, just that.
It was raining and stood together in the rain, that day...
Just two strangers.
He invited me to chill with his friends and him.
Aftward, he walked me home like a gentleman.
I was thinking of him today. I remembered his name.
It's an unusual name with a twist.
I was thinking of going to his friends' place to ask about him.
His friend might still live there.
Not that I have to or want to commit to anyone or anything like that, but it was nice
just to talk and meet his friends.
Going back in time bit me in the ass more than once.
And thinking some people were... Better than they actually were...
Thinking they were better than to do xyz...
And finding out they weren't...
Was me... Learning the hard way about that.
Was them... Showing themselves to me.
It didn't actually matter what I thought about them...
Because they never "had to be" what I thought of them.
They weren't obligated to be something they weren't.
It would have been awesome had they been what I thought they'd be...
But were they obligated to be if they weren't? No?
And that's where that should stand, and be.
Were they obligated to be mature if they weren't? No?
Would have been cool if they were? Yeah?
Were they obligated to know certain things about me if they didn't? No?
Would have been cool if they did? Yeah?
Were they obligated to realize certain things they hadn't? No?
Would have been cool if they had? Yeah?
I can't expect myself from everyone I meet. They are not me.
They are them.
We might not think alike. We might not be on the same page.
I'll only know if we are or not when I know. Just that.
Thinking that we are isn't the same things as actually being on the same page.
Wishing that we were isn't the same thing as actually being on the same page, either.
Unfortunately, it sucks to learn that the ways that I did.
But learning that means knowing that.
Knowing that means navigating it.
Navigating that means making adjustments because of it.
Better to make the adjustments instead of not learning it.
Sometimes important things are hard to learn.
And we wish we didn't have to learn them the way that we did.
But if we hadn't learned those things, we couldn't make those adjustments.
Those adjustments are for us, not for them.
And wanting to be on the same page isn't the same as being on it, either.
Wanting to be, thinking you are, wishing you were...
Isn't the same as being on the same page.
It just isn't. Not much we can do about it, either.
Except to just accept it as a fact.
Are we obligated to think alike if we don't? No?
Then there isn't a point to act as though we are! Right?
On either side. Anyone acting like I was obligated to think like they do...
Or if I acted like they were obligated to think like I do...
Would there be a point to act like that if I'm not obligated and they aren't, either?
To act as though they were?
For them to act as though I was?
Would there be a point in that?
Because if there is a point in that, I'm not seeing it.
If you see it, feel free to tell me.
If you can see a point in something where I can't, feel free to tell me.
I can only write about the things I do see, not the things that I can't.
And if I can't, I can't.
It doesn't mean there is no point.
Just means that I can't see it.
Imagine if I could see everything?
I'd get that "You think you're better than everyone" crap all the time.
Just for seeing what I wasn't supposed to.
Because if I see something someone else couldn't, before they do...
I'm "toxic" or whatever else.
I'm not going to keep myself blind to what others could have seen had they cared to see it!
Because MAYBE THEY WOULD HAVE, TOO.
NOT JUST ME.
ANY TIME I PROVE ANYTHING CONTRARY TO THEIR FALSE NARATIVE, THEY GO HARDER.
BECAUSE THAT'S ALL THEY CAN DO.
BECAUSE THEY COULD ADMIT THEY WERE WRONG, BUT DON'T DO THAT.
BECAUSE ADMITTING THAT ADMITS THAT I WAS RIGHT.
AND THEY CAN'T DO THAT.
WHICH IS OKAY WITH ME.
NOBODY HAS TO ADMIT I WAS RIGHT.
I DON'T NEED THEM TO, TO BE RIGHT.
IT DIDN'T BOTHER ME THAT HE WOULDN'T ADMIT ANYTHING.
IT BOTHERED ME THAT I GAVE HIM THE CHANCE TO DO IT
HAD HE WANTED TO
AND HE STILL DIDN'T EVEN ADMIT THAT.
JUST THAT.
COULD HE HAVE AT LEAST ADMITTED THAT? JUST THAT? NO?
WHAT ELSE WAS HE REFUSING TO ADMIT? JUST THAT?
AND IF HE STILL COULDN'T, WAS THERE A POINT?
IN TRYING TO COMMUNICATE?
WITH SOMEONE I COULDN'T COMMUNICATE WITH?
PROBABLY NOT!
JUST TO PROVE THE FUTILITY IN IT?
TO ACT LIKE EVERY POINT I MADE WAS IN VAIN?
WASTED EXPRESSION AND TIME?
What it felt like was "speaking another language."
Differing drastically from each other...
What I dislike is when people PLAY STUPID.
THEY TRY TO ACT LIKE THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND
WHAT I'M SAYING AND WHY I'M SAYING IT.
THAT REALLY FKN DROVE ME UP A WALL.
THEM ACTING FKN OBLIVIOUS TO THE OBVIOUS.
MIRROR SMASHER DID THAT SH*T TO MY FACE TO P*SS ME OFF.
HE WANTED TO P*SS ME OFF AND OVERDID THAT SH*T.
OVERDID IT TO THE POINT HE OVERSTAYED HIS WELCOME.
AS I WOULD HAVE HAD I OVERDONE THAT SH*T
OR DONE IT AT ALL.
BUT WHAT SHOULD BE FKN OBVIOUS ISN'T SO OBVIOUS TO EVERYONE.
ESPECIALLY THOSE IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS TO...
BUT IT WOULD BE OBVIOUS FROM THEIR OWN PERSPECTIVE.
EVEN ATTEMPTING TO EXPLAIN THIS SH*T TO THEM
IS A WASTE OF TIME
BECAUSE IT WAS COMING FROM ME.
IF IT CAME FROM SOMEONE ELSE,
IT'D MAKE SENSE AND THEY WOULDN'T "REFUSE"
TO FKN REALIZE THINGS THEY COULD HAVE BY NOW.
BUT WHY SHOULD THEY LISTEN TO ME?
"WHY SHOULD I LISTEN TO YOU?!" SOMEONE LITERALLY ASKED ME THIS.
BECAUSE THEY CAN FIND OUT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THEY DON'T!
AND THEY CAN HAVE WHAT THEY CHOSE TO LISTEN TO!
NO MATTER WHERE THAT GOES AND WHY.
AT LEAST ON MY SIDE THERE WASN'T ANY NAFRAIOUS WHY.
IT WAS ACTUALLY FOR THEIR OWN GOOD.
But since I had to learn the hard way, maybe they did, too.
About what I was saying the whole time...
About me.
About some other things...
And I have to be okay with that.
If I wasn't, then I wouldn't be....
"Supporting the process" or whatever by resisting it, not accepting it.
I also have to accept who I was then and who I am now... And why.
So do they. Even if they want "the old me" back.
The old me was tested and had to make adjustments.
BECAUSE I WAS TESTED.
DID I PASS MY TESTS? NOT ALL OF THEM.
NOT BY A LONG SHOT.
BUT WHY WAS I CONSTANTLY TESTED?
JUST TO SEE HOW I WOULD REACT TO XYZ?
AND IF I REACTED IN A WAY THAT WASN'T EXPECTED....
THAT MADE ME "TOXIC."
OR WHATEVER EXCUSE THEY WANTED TO USE TO DIP.
BECAUSE DIPPING IS EASIER THAN ADMITTING ANYTHING.
JUST THAT.
I'M EXPECTED TO JUST BE THERE... HANGING AROUND WAITING OR SOMETHING...
FOR THEM TO COME BACK WHENEVER THEY WANT...
LIKE NOTHING HAPPENED?
LIKE THEY DID NOTHING?
SAID NOTHING?
NEVER ONCE INSULTED ME?
TREATING ME LIKE THAT IS FKN INSULTING.
IT IS. BECAUSE FK THAT.
LIKE "A***'S SUPPOSED TO BE OLD A*** FOREVER." NO.
NOT OBLIGATED TO BE THAT.
FOR ANYONE.
NO MATTER HOW MUCH THEY WANT THAT BACK.
THEY HAD THAT AND DIDN'T APPRECIATE "THE OLD A***." RIGHT?
WHEN I WAS RIGHT THERE! WHEN "OLD A***" WAS "OLD A***."
THEY MISS THINGS ABOUT ME, BUT THEY DON'T MISS ME.
"I MISS OUR TALKS."
THE FACT THAT I COULD COMMUNICATE. JUST THAT.
EVEN THOUGH THERE'S ALWAYS BEEN MORE TO ME THAN JUST THAT...
BUT WHO'D SEE THAT? IT'S NOT SOMETHING I CAN FORCE ANYONE TO SEE!
TO KNOW OR UNDERSTAND ABOUT ME...
THAT THERE'S BEEN MORE TO ME THAN XYZ...
THE WHOLE TIME...
BUT... WHO... WOULD.... SEE... THAT?
THEY'D HAVE TO SEE THAT TO KNOW THAT.
ARE THEY OBLIGATED TO SEE ANYTHING THAT THEY CAN'T?
SOME FILTERS FILTER OUT THE OBVIOUS.
SOME PEOPLE HAVE SELECTIVE VISION.
SELECTIVE "HEARING" IS ONE THING.
THERE'S MORE THAN JUST THAT.
LIKE "SELECTIVE KNOWING."
SO THEY CAN SAY: "I DIDN'T KNOW."
LIKE NOT KNOWING WAS THE REASON THEY DID XYZ.
NOT BECAUSE THEY CHOSE XYZ.... RIGHT?
"SELECTIVE UNDERSTANDING."
SO THEY CAN SAY: "IT WAS A MISUNDERSTANDING."
LIKE NOT UNDERSTANDING WAS THE REASON THEY DID XYZ.
NOT BECAUSE THEY CHOSE XYZ.... RIGHT?
PRETTY SURE THEY DID SEE, KNOW, AND UNDERSTAND.
BUT WANTED A MASK OF IGNORANCE SO THEY CAN SAY THEY DIDN'T!
THAT'S WHAT BOTHERED ME, ALSO.
BECAUSE I KNOW THEY ARE SMART ENOUGH TO SEE, KNOW, AND UNDERSTAND.
EXACTLY WHAT I WAS SAYING AND WHY.
BUT I FOUND OUT THAT HOW I SAID IT SEEMED TO MATTER MORE
THAN WHAT I WAS ACTUALLY SAYING...
WHEN WHAT I WAS SAYING WAS SUPPOSED TO BE THE POINT.
NOT HOW I WAS SAYING IT.
LIKE THEY WOULD RATHER LOOK AT ANYTHING
OTHER THAN WHAT I WAS SAYING AND WHY.
INCLUDING HOW I SAID IT.