I had a thought.... A long shot of a thought. And it's just a thought so don't quote me on this. Also, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong.
I was just watching Cold Case Files on A&E and it was an episode about the zodiac killer. Who has never been caught. I've seen shows about this guy and even the movie, but this idea didn't come to me until just recently. What if one of the victims wasn't actually a victim?
For a long time, the police suspected a guy by the name of Arthur Lee Allan. He has since passed away. after he passed away, they did DNA testing. The samples they tested didn't match. What if the killer wasn't working alone? Maybe the reason those samples didn't match was because he had someone working with him? He's made incriminating statements during interviews. They found bombs in his house like the ones he described in his letters to the media.
I was looking at the pictures of one of the victims and found similarities with the composite. Something tells me that if they did another DNA test, they might find something after all these years. Also, since the crimes took place in the 60's, and they didn't have DNA testing until 1984, there probably was DNA at the scenes.
Another episode I watched was about a woman who was killed by her husband. She had the same first name as me, even spelled the same way, which is kind of rare. You have to admit Abby isn't a very common name.... The husband tried to make it look like an accidental shooting, even though she was deathly afraid of guns. Abby's brother never gave up that it was indeed a homicide. He got the help of a lady named Jane Alexander (who founded Citizens Against Homicide). The homicide detective noticed something in a crime scene photo that had been overlooked: gun powder residue on the sleeves of the victim's sweater. They did ballistics tests that revealed that the only way she could have got it on her sleeves that way is if she had been trying to defend herself. She knew she was about to be shot. Therefore, it wasn't an accident.
It's weird, I kept getting the name Bryan a few days ago... Specifically with a Y, not an I. I thought it was for other reasons...
I'm probably wrong about it. It was just a thought after all. I wonder if anyone else had the same thought.
What I think they should do is go back and look at the crime scene photos again. They may have missed something decades ago that they might find interesting today.
Why was it Bryan's car that the zodiac wrote on? That's another thing that I'm wondering.
My advice is: GO BACK & LOOK AGAIN
Maybe some of the randomness wasn't actually random at all. They have palm prints, they have DNA, they have crime scene photos... Isn't it what they say? A picture is worth a 1,000 words?
I was just watching Cold Case Files on A&E and it was an episode about the zodiac killer. Who has never been caught. I've seen shows about this guy and even the movie, but this idea didn't come to me until just recently. What if one of the victims wasn't actually a victim?
For a long time, the police suspected a guy by the name of Arthur Lee Allan. He has since passed away. after he passed away, they did DNA testing. The samples they tested didn't match. What if the killer wasn't working alone? Maybe the reason those samples didn't match was because he had someone working with him? He's made incriminating statements during interviews. They found bombs in his house like the ones he described in his letters to the media.
I was looking at the pictures of one of the victims and found similarities with the composite. Something tells me that if they did another DNA test, they might find something after all these years. Also, since the crimes took place in the 60's, and they didn't have DNA testing until 1984, there probably was DNA at the scenes.
Another episode I watched was about a woman who was killed by her husband. She had the same first name as me, even spelled the same way, which is kind of rare. You have to admit Abby isn't a very common name.... The husband tried to make it look like an accidental shooting, even though she was deathly afraid of guns. Abby's brother never gave up that it was indeed a homicide. He got the help of a lady named Jane Alexander (who founded Citizens Against Homicide). The homicide detective noticed something in a crime scene photo that had been overlooked: gun powder residue on the sleeves of the victim's sweater. They did ballistics tests that revealed that the only way she could have got it on her sleeves that way is if she had been trying to defend herself. She knew she was about to be shot. Therefore, it wasn't an accident.
It's weird, I kept getting the name Bryan a few days ago... Specifically with a Y, not an I. I thought it was for other reasons...
I'm probably wrong about it. It was just a thought after all. I wonder if anyone else had the same thought.
What I think they should do is go back and look at the crime scene photos again. They may have missed something decades ago that they might find interesting today.
Why was it Bryan's car that the zodiac wrote on? That's another thing that I'm wondering.
My advice is: GO BACK & LOOK AGAIN
Maybe some of the randomness wasn't actually random at all. They have palm prints, they have DNA, they have crime scene photos... Isn't it what they say? A picture is worth a 1,000 words?
No comments:
Post a Comment